Friday, March 17, 2006

Carlyle Group spokesman Christopher Ullman

Carlyle Group spokesman Christopher Ullman: "Carlyle Group spokesman Christopher Ullman, reacted angrily to questions about a possible conflict of interest posed by George H.W. Bush's work for Carlyle.

Speaking to Terry Gross of National Public Radio last week Ullman said that 'there once was a time when impropriety was the measure of impropriety.'

'Now it's the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety by someone like Dan Briody who has an agenda or someone like -- you know, some of these self-appointed do-gooder organizations like the Center on Public Integrity (sic) where the facts that they know are facts they read in the newspaper,' Ullman said. 'They don't call here asking for facts because they're not interested in the truth. They have an agenda. And it is wrong to impugn the integrity of a committed former public servant just because of the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety.'

Briody said that he tried to get Carlyle to answer his questions, but they refused.

'Carlyle has been poked and prodded and people have peered beneath the hood, and for 10 years people have made these types of accusations and for 10 years they have come up with nothing other than hot air about the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety,' Ullman said. 'You know what? It's about time that people either put up or shut up regarding this issue, because people like George"

Corporate Crime Reporter

Corporate Crime Reporter: "Carlyle Group spokesman Christopher Ullman, reacted angrily to questions about a possible conflict of interest posed by George H.W. Bush's work for Carlyle.

Speaking to Terry Gross of National Public Radio last week Ullman said that 'there once was a time when impropriety was the measure of impropriety.'

'Now it's the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety by someone like Dan Briody who has an agenda or someone like -- you know, some of these self-appointed do-gooder organizations like the Center on Public Integrity (sic) where the facts that they know are facts they read in the newspaper,' Ullman said. 'They don't call here asking for facts because they're not interested in the truth. They have an agenda. And it is wrong to impugn the integrity of a committed former public servant just because of the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety.'

Briody said that he tried to get Carlyle to answer his questions, but they refused.

'Carlyle has been poked and prodded and people have peered beneath the hood, and for 10 years people have made these types of accusations and for 10 years they have come up with nothing other than hot air about the hint of the hint of the hint of impropriety,' Ullman said. 'You know what? It's about time that people either put up or shut up regarding this issue, because people like George"

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005

Congressman writes White House: Did President knowingly sign law that didn't pass?

Raw Story | March 16 2006

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) has alleged in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card that President Bush signed a version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that, in effect, did not pass the House of Representatives.

Further, Waxman says there is reason to believe that the Speaker of the House called President Bush before he signed the law, and alerted him that the version he was about to sign differed from the one that actually passed the House. If true, this would put the President in willful violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The full text of the letter follows:

March 15, 2006

The Honorable Andrew Card

Chief of Staff

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Card:

On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law a version of the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005 that was different in substance from the version that passed the U.S. House of Representatives. Legal scholars have advised me that the substantive differences between the versions - which involve $2 billion in federal spending - mean that this bill did not meet the fundamental constitutional requirement that both Houses of Congress must pass any legislation signed into law by the President.

I am writing to learn what the President and his staff knew about this constitutional defect at the time the President signed the legislation.

Detailed background about the legislation and its constitutional defects are contained in a letter I sent last month to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, which I have enclosed with this letter.[1] In summary, the House-passed version of the legislation required the Medicare program to lease "durable medical equipment," such as wheelchairs, for seniors and other beneficiaries for up to 36 months, while the version of the legislation signed by the President limited the duration of these leases to just 13 months. As the Congressional Budget Office reported, this seemingly small change from 36 months to 13 months has a disproportionately large budgetary impact, cutting Medicare outlays by $2 billion over the next five years.[2]

I understand that a call was made to the White House before the legislation was signed by the President advising the White House of the differences between the bills and seeking advice about how to proceed. My understanding is that the call was made either by the Speaker of the House to the President or by the senior staff of the Speaker to the senior staff of the President.

I would like to know whether my understanding is correct. If it is, the implications are serious.

The Presentment Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that before a bill can become law, it must be passed by both Houses of Congress.[3] When the President took the oath of office, he swore to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," which includes the Presentment Clause. If the President signed the Reconciliation Act knowing its constitutional infirmity, he would in effect be placing himself above the Constitution.

I do not raise this issue lightly. Given the gravity of the matter and the unusual circumstances surrounding the Reconciliation Act, Congress and the public need a straightforward explanation of what the President and his staff knew on February 8, when the legislation was signed into law.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman Ranking Minority Member

Enclosure

[1] See Letter from Rep. Henry A. Waxman to Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Feb. 14, 2006).

[2] See Letter from CBO Acting Director Donald Marron to Rep. John M. Spratt, Jr. (Feb. 13, 2006).

[3] U.S. Constitution, Article I,

Boston Public

Alan Shore's closing argument


Alan Shore: When the weapons of mass destruction thing turned out to be not true, I expected the American people to rise up. Ha! They didn't.

Then, when the Abu Ghraib torture thing surfaced and it was revealed that our government participated in rendition, a practice where we kidnap people and turn them over to regimes who specialize in torture, I was sure then the American people would be heard from. We stood mute.

Then came the news that we jailed thousands of so-called terrorists suspects, locked them up without the right to a trial or even the right to confront their accusers. Certainly, we would never stand for that. We did.

And now, it's been discovered the executive branch has been conducting massive, illegal, domestic surveillance on its own citizens. You and me. And I at least consoled myself that finally, finally the American people will have had enough. Evidentially, we haven't.

In fact, if the people of this country have spoken, the message is we're okay with it all. Torture, warrantless search and seizure, illegal wiretappings, prison without a fair trial - or any trial, war on false pretenses. We, as a citizenry, are apparently not offended.

There are no demonstrations on college campuses. In fact, there's no clear indication that young people seem to notice.

Well, Melissa Hughes noticed. Now, you might think, instead of withholding her taxes, she could have protested the old fashioned way. Made a placard and demonstrated at a Presidential or Vice-Presidential appearance, but we've lost the right to that as well. The Secret Service can now declare free speech zones to contain, control and, in effect, criminalize protest.

Stop for a second and try to fathom that.

At a presidential rally, parade or appearance, if you have on a supportive t-shirt, you can be there. If you are wearing or carrying something in protest, you can be removed.

This, in the United States of America. This in the United States of America. Is Melissa Hughes the only one embarrassed?

*Alan sits down abruptly in the witness chair next to the judge*

Judge Robert Sanders: Mr. Shore. That's a chair for witnesses only.

Really long speeches make me so tired sometimes.

Judge Sanders: Please get out of the chair.

Alan: Actually, I'm sick and tired.

Judge Sanders: Get out of the chair!

Alan: And what I'm most sick and tired of is how every time somebody disagrees with how the government is running things, he or she is labeled unAmerican.

U.S. Attorney Jonathan Shapiro: Evidentally, it's speech time.

Alan: And speech in this country is free, you hack! Free for me, free for you. Free for Melissa Hughes to stand up to her government and say "Stick it"!

U.S. Attorney Jonathan Shapiro: Objection!

Alan: I object to government abusing its power to squash the constitutional freedoms of its citizenry. And, God forbid, anybody challenge it. They're smeared as being a heretic. Melissa Hughes is an American. Melissa Hughes is an American. Melissa Hughes is an American!

Judge Sanders: Mr. Shore. Unless you have anything new and fresh to say, please sit down. You've breached the decorum of my courtroom with all this hooting.

Alan: Last night, I went to bed with a book. Not as much fun as a 29 year old, but the book contained a speech by Adlai Stevenson. The year was 1952. He said, "The tragedy of our day is the climate of fear in which we live and fear breeds repression. Too often, sinister threats to the Bill of Rights, to freedom of the mind are concealed under the patriotic cloak of anti-Communism."

Today, it's the cloak of anti-terrorism. Stevenson also remarked, "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."

I know we are all afraid, but the Bill of Rights - we have to live up to that. We simply must. That's all Melissa Hughes was trying to say. She was speaking for you. I would ask you now to go back to that room and speak for her.

Headline News

P2OG: American arrested with arms in Iraq, official says
terroristsUS (28K)

An American described as a security contractor arrested by police in a northern Iraqi town was carrying weapons in his car, a provincial official said. The Joint Coordination Center between the U.S. and Iraqi military in Tikrit said the man, whom it described as a security contractor working for a private company, possessed explosives which were found in his car. It said he was arrested on Tuesday. The man was stopped by police for violating a daytime curfew in Tikrit, a security source said. American security personnel rarely travel alone. U.S. officials had no immediate comment. (One of many stories we have covered proving that 'Contractors' or Mercs are posing as 'terrorists' to cause upheaval and violence in Iraq. If they will do it in Iraq, what's to stop them from doing it here? google P2OG for a better understanding of why this is done...)"

Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch: "Fox News Channel in 1996"

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Secret Societies New World Order Sovereign Citizenship Hemp

Secret Societies New World Order Sovereign Citizenship Hemp: "t Media Bypass is infiltrated or even started by the Intelligence Community to spread false information to the patriot community.
Do you own a cable box? If you do, consider this possibility: Ever since you purchased that cable box and put it on top of your T.V, it has been monitoring and videotaping you in your living room and recor"

Satanic Symbols

Myspace.com

Find me on MySpace and be my friend!http://www.myspace.com/freenot

Monday, March 13, 2006

The JFK Page

The JFK Page: "what Nixon called 'Hanky Panky'"

The DNC had gotten copies of the photographs taken of the three tramps in Dealey Plaza, and identified two of them as long time Nixon henchmen E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis. This put the DNC in a position to at least blackmail the President, if not expose him outright. This is why E. Howard Hunt lead the break-in; it was his own ass he was trying to save.

Santa Barbara IMC: On March 18, Stop the “war on terrorism” by exposing the 911 Inside Job.

Santa Barbara IMC: On March 18, Stop the “war on terrorism” by exposing the 911 Inside Job.: "When a crime is committed that is so extraordinary that people cannot measure it, they go into denial about it. This can be affected by sensitizing belief systems. When Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about his sex life, the Media exaggerating how terribly bad and important it was and thereby set the standard for presidential crimes.

Then we come to 9/11, in which clues of complicity are obvious to anyone who has seen crime shows on TV, including the clumsiness cover-up that followed. But what was obvious was now so overwhelming to the Americans who believed in the importance of Clinton's lie, the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is simply off the chart. So to remain 'reasonable and decent people', they go into denial. Bush used his plain talking preacher language when directing our thoughts he said, 'Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.'

Translation: Don't look behind the curtain.

As a Bush aide said, 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.'

Most preachers of new religions also know that the opposite works: the more outlandish the claim, the more people will want to believe. It works both ways. Belief and denial are closely related."

Sunday, March 12, 2006

September 11, 1990



On September 11, 1990 at 9:09 PM, President George Herbert Walker Bush spoke before a joint session of Congress, regarding the Persian Gulf War. Among other topics, he stated that the war presented an opportunity for a "New World Order" to emerge.

Eleven years later — to the day — the twin towers of the World Trade Center would fall, creating yet another "opportunity" to move...

By the thief of the skull and bones of Geronimo



Here’s the lyrics:

1st Verse:

It happened in a galaxy not so far away
With a dark force mounting, it’s a land in disarray
He who has the will and wants to get their way
Cuts deep to reap, carpe diem (seize the day)
Hack out an empire by hook and by crook
Machiavelli would have gagged at the steps that they took
Improve all instruction, act according to the book
But it came on the sheeple with the ground that they shook
Hands set in motion by the notion of control
Of the souls of those who do exactly what they are told
Stand in line for the ration as the facism unfolds
They twist an iron fist as they tighten their hold
As they come from an acorn of a mighty oak grove
So the tentacles of empire expand and flow
Roots of this dynasty founded long ago
By the thief of the skull and bones of Geronimo!

Chorus:

Wake up, infidel, they’ve taken it too far,
Wake up, infidel, blow up the death star!
Wake up, infidel, you are paying for this war,
Wake up, infidel, destroy the death star!

2nd verse:

They sleep in the tomb, but brother he was down
Married old Yankee money, Prescott don’t f*** around
Invested in the Nazis with a bunch of other clowns
Henry Ford, Tyson, Bush, Harriman and Brown
1952, he flew down to get up in it
Blood money bought a seat in the U.S. Senate
Sure, grandpa had the vision, Herbert Walker sold the dope
Profits from the holocaust, George Bush drenched in coke
George Herbert Walker set off to have some fun
Now number one son going to run some guns
Cuba, 1960, smokescreen: Zapata
They couldn’t take the Bay of Pigs, accountable for nada
Making papa proud, he do all for da-da
His first taste of blood, his own intifada
Congress and ambassador, move up the ladder
Stabbed Nixon in the back, war chest getting fatter!

Repeat Chorus:

Wake up, infidel, they’ve taken it too far,
Wake up, infidel, blow up the death star!
Wake up, infidel, you are paying for this war,
Wake up, infidel, destroy the death star!

3rd verse:

Director CIA, 1976
Ollie North run the coke, the carrot and the stick
Angola, Noriega, profits getting thick
Put Saddam in power, that also do the trick
Hostage release delayed for a week
Snap Carter in two, Reagan takes a seat
After Reagan descends, then the real fun begins
Unleash the war machine, stretch the dollar thin
One thousand points of light, a new world order
Orchestrate the conflict, break down the border
Introducing drugs, creating disorder
Then they feast on the madness as the time gets shorter!

Repeat Chorus:

Wake up, infidel, they’ve taken it too far,
Wake up, infidel, blow up the death star!
Wake up, infidel, you are paying for this war,
Wake up, infidel, destroy the death star!

Final verse:

The son and dark knight, high as a kite
Light saber fight with a fist full of white
Tries to escape fate but his destiny’s in sight
Tries to take credit, but he’s just not that bright
Dummy is a mouthpiece for government lies
Burned up desert planet wins votes for these guys
Attracted to power and mass genocide
George Herbert Walker fell to the dark side
Reichstag America, 9-1-1
It’s all too easy, you’re giving up your guns
Battle the beast in the hot desert sun
Abdullah sizzles hot dogs, and George Bush is one!

Repeat Chorus:

Wake up, infidel, they’ve taken it too far,
Wake up, infidel, blow up the death star!
Wake up, infidel, you are paying for this war,
Wake up, infidel, destroy the death star

The Russell Bloodline

The Russell Bloodline: "Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech said, 'This ceremony is held in the depth of winter. But, by the words we speak and the faces we show the world, we force the spring.’ Clinton repeated the words ‘we force the spring’ later in the speech. That expression is a very unusual expression. To ‘force the spring' is witchcraft language. In witchcraft and Satanism Lucifer (Baal) rises from the underworld on May 1st (also known by the following list of names Beltaine, a major European holiday, Communism and the Illuminati’s chief holiday, and Walpurgis). The May 1st rising brings forth the season of fertility, which the witches each year take credit for, by claiming that their magic rituals ‘force the spring.’ The ritual magic that ‘forces the spring’ is done on 3 Sabbats-the first is Imbolg (also known by names: Candiemas by the Catholics and Ground Hog Day by common dupes); the second is the vernal equinox (Mar. 20) in which blood and sex rituals are carried out and the third is Beltaine (May 1) in which fire festivals are done."

Bill Clinton in his inaugural speech said, "This ceremony is held in the depth of winter. But, by the words we speak and the faces we show the world, we force the spring.’ Clinton repeated the words ‘we force the spring’ later in the speech. That expression is a very unusual expression. To ‘force the spring" is witchcraft language. In witchcraft and Satanism Lucifer (Baal) rises from the underworld on May 1st (also known by the following list of names Beltaine, a major European holiday, Communism and the Illuminati’s chief holiday, and Walpurgis). The May 1st rising brings forth the season of fertility, which the witches each year take credit for, by claiming that their magic rituals ‘force the spring.’ The ritual magic that ‘forces the spring’ is done on 3 Sabbats-the first is Imbolg (also known by names: Candiemas by the Catholics and Ground Hog Day by common dupes); the second is the vernal equinox (Mar. 20) in which blood and sex rituals are carried out and the third is Beltaine (May 1) in which fire festivals are done.

3-11-06 Milosovic Poisoned.

SKULL & BONES SYMBOL IS FINALLY UNDERSTOOD. IT IS A MAGICAL SYMBOL HIDING A MOST IMPORTANT INNER NUMERIF MEANING - 666

SKULL & BONES SYMBOL IS FINALLY UNDERSTOOD. IT IS A MAGICAL SYMBOL HIDING A MOST IMPORTANT INNER NUMERIF MEANING - 666

Thus, the "X" on which the Skull & Bones human skull is sitting equals "600"!

But, now where do we find the "66" to give the entire "Magical Symbol" the numeric equivalent to "666"? To gain this proper understanding, we need to calculate the number "322" as an occultist would normally calculate.

When you multiply "3x2", you naturally get "6". Then, when you multiply "6" times the third digit, "2", you get "12". To the occultist, the number "12" hides the more offensive number "66", since "6+6=12". The calculation from the number "322" would look like this:

"3x2=6; 6x2= 12; since "12" is thought to be "6+6", an occultist would understand "322" to have a numeric value of "66".

Thus, adding the "600" value of the "X" to the "66" value of "322", you arrive at the total numeric value of "666".

Therefore, this Skull & Bones symbol equals "Antichrist" in two ways:

1. The letter "X" by itself is a symbol of Antichrist.

2. The total numeric value of the "Magic Symbol" of the Skull & Bones symbol equals "666", the Biblical symbol of Antichrist (Rev 13:18)